Archive for December, 2008

Another article on a call for Canada joining forces with the US

Another recent article posted in the Toronto Star today (Dec. 9, 2008) is calling for Canada to focus on coordinating our economic policy with the US.

The article by Daniel Schwanen, explains that, “…an internaitonally coordinated stimulus is a practical requirement of any effective effort. Because the economic downturn is global, the direction of policy needs to be global. Joint action is also needed because of the huge problem of ‘free-riders’ who would hitch their recovery to others’ stimulative packages.”

So, there you have it, another push for a global economy. Further in the article, Schwanen states that, “…For Canada, a particular focus of the international stabilization approach should be on coordinating with the United States. Ottawa will have to work very closely with the US administration and, where necessary, advise and support it on a range of trade and industry stabilization measures. Canada should contribute to such policies if it can be assured that the US administration will not accept measures that support activity solely within the US at the expense of its neighbours.”

All this sounds quite nice, but it is nothing more than laying the groundwork for the soon-to-happen North American Union.  The gist that is gotten from this piece is that Canada would be a secondary part of the union; it all sounds very nice, but under the nice song of cooperation and community is the discordant noise of integration and loss of sovereignty.

Get Close to Obama on economy and security, paper says

by Gloria Galloway
The Globe and Mail
December 9, 2008, Page A6
www.theglobeandmail.com

A group of influential foreign-affairs experts wants Prime Minister Stephen Harper to develop a close friendship with president-elect Barack Obama and forge deeper ties between Canada and the United States.

The belief that Canada should not get too close to its giant neighbour is the “mantra of elites” and most Canadians do not share such fears, says a blueprint for engagement between the two countries that was release yesterday by the Canada-US Project.

“Stephen Harper and Barack Obama should work quickly to develop a strong personal relationship,” it says, quoting a paper contributed to the project by Robin Sears, who was a member of Bob Rae’s staff when Mr. Rae was leader of the Ontario NDP.

“For Mr. Haper, becoming the first Canadian Prime Minister to have a real friendship with an American president since Brian Mulroney, the risks are smaller than they may appear. Barack Obama is widely popular among Canadians, even Conservatives.”

After the terrorist attacks of 2001 and amid the economic meltdown of 2008, the concerns on this side of the border should be that “the United States, battered and bitter, humbled and apprehensive, may retreat into Fortress America,’ the document says.

Time should not be squandered trying to find trilateral solutions to North American problems if they can more easily be resolved without the input of Mexico, it says.

“The addition of Mexico as a partner could, on some issues, muddy the waters,” the blueprint says. “This is especially true on matters of defence, border security, the environment, Arctic development and regulation — issues which are either of limited concerns to Mexico or where our own national interests are arguably more closely aligned with those of the United States…”

The group is chaired by Derek Burney, a former Canadian ambassador to the United States who was part of Mr. Harper’s transition team, and Fen Osler Hampson, director of the school of international affairs at Carleton University.

It began last spring to request papers from people such as Mr. Sears, who have a deep interest in Canada-US relations. Those 16 papers and the resulting blueprint were presented at a conference in Ottawa yesterday. The document will be vetted to reflect yesterday’s discussions and presented to Mr. Harper before Mr. Obama’s January inaguration.

Canada must be ready, early in 2009, to deploy a strategy aimed at persuading US political leaders of the need to pursue mutual homeland security and domestic economic objectives, the blueprint says.

“We think it’s a unique opportunity when you have a change of administration of this kind,” Mr. Burney said in an interview with the Globe and Mail. “We think it’s a great time to be recalibrating the relationship on a whole host of issues.”

Gordon Griffin, a former US ambassador to Canada who participaed in yesterday’s conference, said of the blueprint: “Put that on the table; that will get the attention of the next United States government.”

File under “Weird news”

I was leaving my local grocery store, when I saw the latest issue of the Epoch Times. I don’t usually pick it up, but this time I had to.

Axl Rose leads plot for global domination, screamed the headline. I thought it was a joke and brought it home to show the family. We thought it was most appropriate since Rose just released Chinese Democracy, or that it was a brilliant marketing scheme. It wasn’t. I had to check a couple of times to make sure the date wasn’t April 1. I’m reproducing the article below in full for you to judge for yourself.

Axl Rose leads plot for global domination

by Michael Mahonen

Special to the Epoch Times, p.1

Chinese state media today released information from unidentified sources who revealed a plot currently being undertaken to “grasp and control the world using democracy as a pawn.”

Communist Party newspaper, Global Times, also revealed that China was the main focus of the attack, as the agressor, “turns its spear point on China.”

The startling news also revealed the threat to be part of a larger plot by Western nations to “venomously attack China”. The main weapon identified in the international conspiracy is the new Guns ‘n’ Roses album.

The album, called “Chinese Democracy”, has raised questions about the meaning behind the title.

Guns n’ Roses bandleader, Axl Rose, is said to have been plotting his quest for global domination for the part 17 years. He ven spoke publicly of his plans for the “album” in 1994, prompting some to comment that it was a “plot cooked up in the open.”

We were unable to speak with Mr. Rose’s spokespeople, as we did not attempt to make contact.

The title of the article in the Communist paper, “American band releases album venomously attacking China”, seemed to hint at the identity of one of the Western nations thought to be involved in the global plot, but the article did not mention specifics.

It is believed that China’s Communist authorities will be looking closely into Mr. Rose’s past in an attempt to ascertain the identities of the Western nations being lead by Mr. Rose in this international conspiracy.

Some clues may include the fact that Mr. Rose sometimes wears a kilt on stage, which could implicate Scotland or Ireland.

Considering that the paper believes the conspirators intend to implement democracy as the sole global ideology, new meaning may be read into the fact that Mr. Rose has often been seen on stage vehemently gesticulating with a single finger in the air. Research may be conducted into the true meanings behind “flip” and “bird”.

However, long time Guns n’ Roses fans may simply see this as another paranoid example of “all Communist and no party”.